(Play while you read: La negra – Yukele – new window)
To R., personally, of course.
Dear O.,
I’d like you to understand when I (will) share experiences and stories with you I do not expect to change any of your acts based on it.
A life is a very unique narrative process and I am sure we could have opposite views on the same fact or simply extract different conclusions. Still I feel impeled to let you know about some realities that are not usually disclosed in the public discourse and might be useful to you in times of boredom, loneliness or lost path.
I was on one of those periods of (let’s say deeper) lost path when I started taking pictures. I had a girlfriend on the time, lovely, who gave me a basic book on photography, the essentials: composition, speed, diaphragm, diferences between eye and camera, everything is light… That was all.
I wasn’t sure what to do with the knowledge at all. More technical as it was it felt to me feasible to grasp a bit of what art could be, one more childhood trauma (the absence of comprehension of art).
Lost as I was, close to teenaging as I always am, I didn’t know what to show, what to tell about. It was difficult times, I was spending my medical exams month as kitesurf teacher/waiter in a hut on the beach. There wasn’t really much to tell on that sandy, lonely, paradise to which I didn’t belong, either…
There was one thing I knew I was interested about: penumbra. Curious, paranoid, as I am, I felt the camera was a perfect tool to visualize those spaces, times, realities, denied to the human eye but impacting deeply on brain cortex.
I forgot to tell you I arrived into photography on the last days of what they would later call analogic. We were using film, plastic with chemical components, to inmortalize reality bites. There was already people working on digital effects, usually gross, with crazy colours and incredible contents and composition, through post-edition. I took the determination to show by analogic photography, by a mechanical process, you could prove reality to be as surprising and unexpected, as magic, as those digital editions intended to show through very elaborated manipulations.
At first I took some pictures for kitesurfers, and some for wedding parties. Both showed the same limitation regarding art: the subject wanted to appear pretty and cool, usually prettier and cooler than he/she really were. Unless you get a private contract (I did and was amazing) it’s really difficult to put many art/truth on it. You are there for the portrait, not for the narrative. However, dear nephew, there is always something to learn on dark times and situations (I will repeat this tirelessly) : those experiences were excellent to master camera managing, fast framing and composition.
Later on I had more freedom and I decided to just take the camera with me any time of any day. If I wanted to show a piece of reality the camera had to be there with me. It’s also true I still hadn’t found what I wanted to talk about. So, I was walking around the city, night and day with my huge camera in a bag with a huge interrogation mark. “Sembrando la duda” I used to call it, the bag, as a doubled artistic performance, hiting any conscience with a question even when they wouldn’t realice (recognice) about it.
Apparently I wasn’t moving much forward but there were two fundamental facts: keeping the camera by my side and keeping on my erratic walk on life in the seek of something I could not even describe.
There is an extra fact to this: on the analogical times we had films with a limited number of pictures, I used 36. From time to time I would go to a photo shop to have the films turned into paper and I would spend some time afterwards, with coffee and cigarrettes, looking at the images, comparing them to the memory of when, where, how, I took them. I would select my favourites and my less favourites, as if it hadnt been me the one to shoot them.
Once I put a handfull of the ones I liked on the bed and took a deep look… Got some more… and start grouping them. That’s the way I discovered my city was most of the time painted in orange and blue, that I was an urban kid deeply impressed by the plain colourfull country in the road to the capital, that I would be able to portrait people in movement obtaining numerous identities in one only picture and person (much more realistic from my point of view than the classical ones…) and so on… I had found my voice, through systematic instrospection, into art.
Not sure why I told you about this O. This is probably basic knowledge to you, if you ignore the power of image, if you choose not to be aware of it’s limitations and powerful subliminal effects…
I guess the important part of photography to me, as a scientist but also as a nomad, was it was able to prove reality much more complex than it appeared, than everyone usually tries to play it down to. Possibly this felt good because as a nomad I could feel that already but as a scientist I needed something touchable to prove it and allow me not to feel (totally) crazy.
I´ll be writing you soon nephew.
Take a deep rest now, be prompt later.
Love
J.